Superceded SAVING THE SUMMER. SAVING THE ECONOMY. THE PROPOSAL.

Proposal letter in the FT
Substantially updated 16 June.  Please click this link.

“London we have a problem.”  The UK is now the sick man of Europe.  We have a much higher level of COVID-19 infections than...

Comments

  1. Jimmy Mack17 June 2020 at 01:11

    You don't understand the R rate. Lockdown never got us to 0.5 and keeping it longer doesn't mean it gets lower. Other measures are more effective at getting it down (track and trace) once infections are low enough to manage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. COVID Out17 June 2020 at 13:15

      The published R rate went down to 0.4-0.7. New infections couldn't have fallen rapidly unless R was significantly below 1.

      Track/Trace/Isolate is fine in theory but fraught with problems in practice. False negatives on testing of 40% or more I am reliably advised by someone working on a research project on swab tests. False positived on contacts. And without testing, this leads to false imprisonment. Plus a whole host of techincail problems with "Got it" testing, such as dealing with RNA changes in the virus. Already over 13 variants.

      So I do understanfd the R rate and don't think Track/Trace/Isolate is the magic answer. Techniques to actually stop transmission of the virus are the answer

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

R, R, WHERE R'T THOU R? (Updated 29 May)

Image
R has gone AWOL.  The king of the COVID metrics is missing, presumed dead.  Yet so important.  That's what I wrote early on 28 May.  I then found something that made me fall off my chair.  I'm now returning to the topic late morning on 29 May: R is so important as an indicator of how well this coronavirus is being kept under control, and a key part of assessing whether lockdown restrictions can be eased or indeed need to be tightened .  But R is only useful if reflecting the transmission rate now.  The problem is that it isn't.  I am shocked! RECENT ANNOUNCEMENTS OF R On 15 May, Sir Patrick Vallance, joint chair of SAGE, tweeted this: We'll go to that web page in a moment.  But before that.... Sir Patrick has tweeted nothing about R since 15 May (as at 10 pm on 29 May).  Nor has Professor Chris Whitty , the other joint chair, presumably as his brief is medical matters.    . So I looked at all the slides...
Read more

THE MONDAY AFTER THE NIGHT BEFORE

Image
On Sunday evening 10 May, PM Johnson broadcast a pre-recorded message that set out some sensible overall concepts. But his talk has been widely slated for a lack of clarity, and that consensus hadn't been developed with either the devolved administrations of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, nor with Labour and other political parties. Frankly it looked like a Year 12 school project that had gone horribly wrong. Could it get any worse?  Hold my beer! Dominic Raab, the Foreign Secretary, did a round of media interviews on Monday morning that confused people even more.  And resulted in some of the things he said having to be corrected. Later in the day, a round of briefing papers were released to Parliament, and PM Johnson appeared in the Commons to answer questions.  Again not good. This is Keir Starmer, Labour leader, trying to make sense of the documents in the Commons this afternoon The story so far is set out in this damning article "Motor misfires ...
Read more